on September 4, 2010 by admin in Global Warming, Comments (25)

Global Warming and the Love of Children? True News from Freedomain Radio


Can we really believe politicians when they talk about their concern for what kind of weather our great grandchildren might experience?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

25 Comments

  1. rescuemay

    September 4, 2010 @ 11:58 am

    lol. . . banana skin

  2. gina7177

    September 4, 2010 @ 12:57 pm

    A childhood friend has – he is a Communist? Have about f? R th?.

  3. Niightversionn

    September 4, 2010 @ 1:10 pm

    The Alliance for Climate Education is r? Pand the adult world? Rmung alarmism Gospel Sch? Applicants? at the school? reveals to be a time of Montage.Es? re that ACE teachers are more than just a smooth walk? cator, they are also recruiters. Apr? S have parl? with the young hip? dazzle animation and jokes, they work? sign the f? R Addresses their anti-consumption (Am? Ricans are? Bl? Sea) often cause gather num? Ros t?? S cell phone and e-mail without their parents knowledge

  4. DCLugi

    September 4, 2010 @ 1:37 pm

    I take that as a yes? Then. People do things, my friend. That’s all it is.

  5. tombeardman

    September 4, 2010 @ 1:53 pm

    @ DCLugi, the questions you tight k? Can by lekt? Re the Constitution? United States for yr? Lay. I can also ask you if you drove a car from a public street st? Cents. M? M Glicherweise want? More sp? Cific, perhaps? Be discussing what is meant by “the Community?” meant. As of? Democracy, we s? By? S the c? T? the collective right? us ? each other taxes. I do not agree with everything that we d? Think of the money, and that is why I stay in touch with my weight? Hlten officials and let them know what I think. You should try it.

  6. DCLugi

    September 4, 2010 @ 2:45 pm

    So the question is simple: Am I allowed to take your money, if I do I know best what to do with that? I have the right to “Auserw? Hlten take” another person with your money?

  7. RichLOAguy

    September 4, 2010 @ 3:18 pm

    A barrel floating in the sea will increase algae farm. There was new? Just too big for? T e tropical seaweed farms for cr? St Mid Ocean. The companies w? Made rden photosynthesis? Is algae, and life itself m? W me? Werden.Billig carbon rden. Proactive. Harmlos.Auch Mid Ocean algae (seaweed) plants have? T? bed? Rftige L? Nder f? A trailer? of emergency food aid, fuel werden.Kein Nachteil.Build seaweed farms in the c? and you came? No? ? sea and anchor. Polluting companies k? Sponsor Nnten of d? Pressure Win Win Kosten.Win

  8. cristop5

    September 4, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

    So, if we? About our children and the future of care we should do nothing? About Adult World? Rmung. Why it takes 11 minutes to say? Daf The reason? R, is that such discursive sophistry takes time to build Castles cards. Each error is lashings of bullshit and rh? Masked ring? Real werden.Hier? T Stef. We k? Can or not? Be able to ausm it? att? Nuer climate change. So k? We can all try to limit? G? Ts, or us k? M can nitpick? Disez & the ice disappear? T.

  9. tombeardman

    September 4, 2010 @ 4:16 pm

    Stefbot is false and not dr? It. It ll am? In? Talking? Government?, As if it’s great EB? With “Boogie Man”. To the states-Americans, at least the government is? “We the people.” Their logic is wrong and sad. I now before this is why we have f anything? R or k now? Nftig do. Smart . M? with me?? economy far behind our need for action is equally stupid. He did? Obviously no id of this e r happens? Ellement. What is a bit silly .

  10. creamrising

    September 4, 2010 @ 5:02 pm

    On a submarine and two friends. You? Your g? Nial.

  11. VyseLegend

    September 4, 2010 @ 5:16 pm

    You? Your ag? Denies Stef.

  12. comradshaw

    September 4, 2010 @ 6:04 pm

    Nat? It is natural “v? Lliga THE Cherlich” that nation states can not or do nothing? About global anthropogenic for adults? Rmung. Many anti-? Tatistics like me who believe that, in fact humanity’s? the only mani? re put an end to global human adults? Rmung by talk of? Barrass state / capitalism (both unit? S as if they are ahead of them are independent? Dently expect from each other what they do not). It is not in itself a dichotomy between anti-? Tatistics and extras.

  13. StrafingMoose

    September 4, 2010 @ 6:47 pm

    It appears that you target the right audience? this? regard. Each Vern? Nftige no comments sch? Shake the MSM diff? Ent r? Gurgite? Be bl? D? Thread?. Good job!

  14. sirscutter

    September 4, 2010 @ 7:39 pm

    But then w? Rde it is not the big forehead Speckled e? E? Be CHIG!

  15. rockondon9

    September 4, 2010 @ 7:59 pm

    Geez, I think he made each point in the ten times vid. Is the target Alzheimer’s patients? This vid was 11min w? Re more effective if it has? T? condensed? e 3-4min.

  16. kokopelli314

    September 4, 2010 @ 8:02 pm

    That is exactly why we CONFIRM bin for other forms of? Social studies?. In particular, robust, sustainable companies can teach us a thing or two-years. It’s like learning? k? Lters can food in r? Tainer closed? S?, So k? No one can eat? power ex? execution? Fill, or? pr? preservation and emphasis on efficiency?, or with a system? my legal starts and ends with trust and mutual respect between individuals.

  17. MarmaladeINFP

    September 4, 2010 @ 8:05 pm

    ? People often say my reading, the work goes well, it’s clear that you do not like this culture, but what would you replace it? The r? Answer is that I no culture to replace this culture. I want a thousand cultures ten hours to replace this culture, composed? S each of organically? from their own place. Thats how people are saying about the plan? You (or more pr? Cis? Ment, their land bases,? As given? That each group lives in a dress? … What is the point …) before culture together? on the r? production of all cultures? one. “

  18. MarmaladeINFP

    September 4, 2010 @ 8:57 pm

    orionmagazineDOTorg/indexDOTphp/articles/article/5240 / “A r? s strength? merry ways to win a commitment that is? find what it means f? r? win. F? r win me eh? t live in a world … ever? t? not by Verwer industry? do. And Ill get it al? down (and if so, moreover, do you think all that is needed is the code language of violence, youre not r? v? nothing, but the v? be? belief that nonviolence is ineffective). “

  19. kokopelli314

    September 4, 2010 @ 9:15 pm

    Some years ago? Es, H Ren? From “The Other Side of Darkness”, Derrick suggests? R? it is an r? response appropriate? e to d? ming? tion of our infrastructure to support life.

  20. MarmaladeINFP

    September 4, 2010 @ 9:54 pm

    We probably agree on this Thema.Ich wei? ck not whether or not?. My point is simply to do w? Re Require the end of civilization. Despite? No comments? ative, I find myself? beigef made? civilization? Gt.Aber I did not notice great on the issue. If the collapse of civilization nnte k? This positive benefits such as Derrick Jensen Jensen setzt.Wo you? Kalishnikovs that about? He has more than frustration OD? Me to rise?.

  21. MarmaladeINFP

    September 4, 2010 @ 10:23 pm

    I do pr? Tend not f. sp? Cial? Something R. People are more active in their collectivism? will be good for me.

  22. DarkEyedDonna

    September 4, 2010 @ 10:33 pm

    I ‘? Tudie not that kind of thing. Most of this? On my t? You. I think it should? Be an r? Answer. Why are we always argue? It all makes sense if we can work together k?. I know m? Not new to me. That too? Taking precedence. I just try to do my part. I do the online community volat? my? church. I think if people helped each other more, then br? We smoke?, M? Me no government. Nobody seems? k mmern question?. Why do all this? About the adult world? To Rmung excited? S? I think that’s true, but I know it is not.

  23. DarkEyedDonna

    September 4, 2010 @ 11:09 pm

    ? Re you claiming f? A big government e or f? A collapse of civilization? I think it should? M very people? Active in their collectivism?. I k? Me MMER not the government. Everyone wants to complain. I f you demand?? Sometimes I v? Cu in? Simpler era, but I m chte? No collapse of civilization.

  24. vegaswolf

    September 4, 2010 @ 11:40 pm

    What I find? Sant is a lot of people are imm? Immediately immersed? S in? Science? and? facts? r in propaganda? shareholder. The point is not science. . . The point is the attack on a government L? Solution is v? Lock Lliga? Something. You have nothing, but we did not see her – but with what we expect diff? Ent? Ha!

  25. kokopelli314

    September 5, 2010 @ 12:23 am

    I noticed? there are many thumbs up / down on this particular subject. Hmmm. . . Anyway, I agree that our soci? T? world? e is too big? k and complex ant? We can not and probably should not? be on baggage, but there are proven invaluable on? ons? shoot. I do not know if we “for the purpose of our W? T? Kalashnikov Ldern you need?, Like Derrick Jensen suggests? R?. You can m?? Sible to int? Interior /? Reconstruction .

Leave a comment

XHTML: Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>